A lack of awareness, poor quality of care, and gender inequalities are factors associated with access and utilisation of leprosy services.
Objectives
This study aimed to identify factors affecting community access and utilisation of leprosy services in high-burden districts of Ethiopia.
Method
A community-based cross-sectional study design was utilised and a simple random sampling technique was used to recruit study respondents. One hundred and sixty-one respondents completed the self-administered structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors associated with leprosy services. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
More than 75% (n = 123) of study respondents had limited knowledge about leprosy. However, respondents who reside in urban areas were knowledgeable about the disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 8.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6, 42.0). Men were most likely to use health care facilities (AOR [95% CI] = 2.9 [1.2, 7.2]). In addition, those who had better household income were more likely to have examined their family members for leprosy compared to low-income families (AOR [95% CI] = 4.5 [1.6, 12.9]).
Conclusion
General knowledge about leprosy was low in communities. However, persons infected with leprosy who resided in the urban areas had a better understanding of leprosy. Male persons infected with leprosy were more likely to utilise leprosy services.
Contribution
The results of this study provide early insights into the factors associated with leprosy service utilisation to provide community-centred leprosy care.
accesshigh-burden districtsleprosyleprosy servicesutilisationFunding information This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.Introduction
Leprosy is a disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae, whose natural reservoir is humans.1 The transmission of leprosy remains poorly understood. However, it is generally accepted that inhalation of aerosol droplets from infected individuals with high bacillary loads is the most common mechanism.2 Leprosy affects the skin, upper respiratory tract mucous membranes and peripheral nerves. Most people have natural immunity to leprosy, and only a few develop the disease.2 Leprosy is a leading cause of permanent physical disability because of infectious diseases worldwide owing to delays in diagnosis and initiation of treatment for leprosy patients.3
Studies have shown that several patient-related factors could influence access and utilisation of leprosy services in endemic communities.4 Lack of awareness about leprosy is one of the key factors behind the delay in diagnosis and initiation of treatment among leprosy sufferers. Therefore, leprosy awareness activities advocate the detection of leprosy at an early stage of disease development.5 Furthermore, the infected communities need to be informed that leprosy can be easily treated and cured through the involvement of patients, including their family members and affiliated associations such as persons infected with leprosy.4
Most people infected with leprosy practice self-medication immediately after the onset of symptoms, and therefore, they tend to rely on home-based remedies.5 In contrast, poor quality of health care can delay the diagnosis of leprosy early in disease development in leprosy-endemic areas.6 The risk of misdiagnosis for leprosy patients who received substandard health care is higher than for leprosy patients who received better health care. In addition, people infected with leprosy have been stigmatised and discriminated against by the attitudes and beliefs of society towards the disease because of misconceptions about the lack of treatment and visible deformities because of nerve damage.7 In particular, women infected with leprosy are more likely to be underreported to the national programmes and less likely to be detected at the health care facilities because of associated factors such as low socio-economic status, limited mobility, illiteracy and low levels of leprosy knowledge and cultural influences.8
Other studies have also mentioned that health system-related factors such as health service organisation and health worker skills may influence the accessibility and utilisation of leprosy treatments.9 A study conducted in China shows that the provision of leprosy contact tracing services from the registered index cases of leprosy was only 60%.10 Therefore, assessing the accessibility of leprosy care can play an important role in improving coverage and smooth service delivery in leprosy-infected communities.11 However, few studies have been conducted to assess factors that may influence leprosy service utilisation among infected communities in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors that influence leprosy service utilisation among communities in high-burden districts of Ethiopia. Leprosy high-burden districts are districts with average 6 years’ leprosy prevalence rate accounting for ≥ 1 case per population of 10 000.12 The majority of high-burden districts (91.4%) were found in Amhara and Oromia regions, contributing 54% of all leprosy cases notification to the national programme.12 For example, 2046 leprosy cases were reported from the Oromia region, while 1409 cases were reported from the Amhara region in 2018.13 Moreover, the World Health Organization (WHO)’s report for the year 2023 considered Ethiopia as one of the top 23 global leprosy priority countries, which notified 2966 new leprosy cases in 2022.14
Research methods and design
The authors declare that this research paper was part of a larger community-based intervention research design study that focused on Phase 1 of the research – Information gathering and synthesis. The theoretical framework of this research was based on the Theory of Change of Model (ToCM). Theory of Change of Model is a procedural production of the programme to describe the list of activities that lead to the desired outcomes and the connections between programme activities and outcomes at each stage.15 Moreover, ToCM identifies gaps or opportunities for improvement.16
Study design
A cross-sectional study design was used to determine the leprosy service utilisation and associated factors among leprosy-infected individuals in leprosy-burdened districts of Ethiopia. Cross-sectional research design is the collection of data at a specific point in time to describe the status of relationships between phenomena.17 Therefore, this cross-sectional study was applied to describe the use and identification of factors associated with leprosy diagnosis, treatment and contact tracing services.
Study setting
The study was conducted in two selected leprosy high-burden districts of the Amhara and Oromia regions of Ethiopia.
Study population
The population for this phase of the study consisted of individuals who had been diagnosed and treated in the health care facilities of leprosy high-burden districts in the two selected districts of Ethiopia in the last 5 years.
Sampling technique and procedure
Using a simple random sampling technique, leprosy-infected individuals who had been diagnosed and treated were selected from the register lists of the health care facilities in high-burden districts. The contact details of the persons infected with leprosy were obtained from the leprosy registration books. The health extension workers employed at the community health posts were tasked with tracing the leprosy patients living in their catchment areas. Leprosy patients were then gathered at healthcare facilities, and information was given about the nature of the study. Finally, those persons infected with leprosy who could consent to participate in the study were sampled. The exclusion criteria were those who had not been diagnosed in high leprosy districts’ health care facilities and whose leprosy documents were not found for the last 5 years.
Sample size
The required sample size was determined using a single proportion formula (Equation 1):
n=(Z∝/2)2p(1−p)Δ2
Where
n = Sample size.
Z = The Z score of confidence interval (CI) at 95% takes the standard value of 1.96.
P = The prevalence of leprosy in high-burden districts.
Δ = The margin of error (5%) between the population and sample.
Therefore, considering the estimated prevalence (5%) of leprosy in high-burden districts,12 the sample size was calculated to be 73. As this study used two districts, the overall sample size was 146. Moreover, by the assumption of the missed patients in the registration books in the health care facilities, this study estimated 10% of the non-respondent rate. Therefore, the overall sample size was calculated as 161.
Data collection and procedure
A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the necessary information. The self-administered questionnaires were initially prepared in English and translated into local languages such as Amharic and Oromifa. The data collection tool collected information on factors associated with delay in diagnosis and treatment, including contact tracing from the perspective of persons infected with leprosy. The first part of the questions dealt with the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents, and the second part focused on patients’ understanding of the leprosy problems, diagnosis and treatment of leprosy. The second part of the questions also discussed factors determining delays in leprosy contact tracing activities, diagnosis and treatment linkage services.
Two data collectors were trained in data collection procedures and ethical considerations. Data were collected in the health care facilities through maintaining COVID-19 pandemic regulations during Phase 1 of the research (between January and June 2022).
Variables
The dependent variables were associated with the leprosy services such as leprosy diagnosis, contact tracing and treatment linkage activities. The independent variables were factors that affect the utilisation of leprosy services by persons infected with leprosy.
Data management and analysis
Data cleaning was performed through manual review using SPSS version 26 software packages in the early stage of data collection and entry processes. Questionnaires that were not completed and lacked consistency were discarded. Furthermore, after data entry, the consistency of all data was ensured using the software SPSS version 26.0 packages by performing a simple frequency, split and select analysis.
Logistic regression analysis was performed in response to the research objectives and associated variables (dependent and independent variables). Moreover, data were entered and summarised using frequencies and percentages. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant to determine the degree of association among the study variables. The mean value of the variables was used to report the findings within its 95% CI.
Data validity
In this study, the self-administered questionnaires were pre-tested to measure what they were supposed to measure by involving 30 respondents from persons infected with leprosy. The questionnaires were modified for the questions the respondents found challenging to understand. The data obtained during pre-testing were not considered part of the main study.
Data reliability
In this study, to ensure the reliability of the data collection tools, a Cronbach’s alpha (α) test was applied. This test is a coefficient that tests or tells about the internal consistency of a given measurement tool.18 The coefficient of α is a value that ranges between 0.0 and 1.0. A score of ≥ 0.7 will imply that the instrument is acceptable or reliable. Those with a score of less than 0.7 will denote that there will be no consistency in measurement.18 Therefore, Cronbach’s α test value was found to be 0.7 for the person infected with leprosy self-administered questionnaires.
Ethical considerations
Data were collected after obtaining an Ethical Clearance Certificate from the College of Human Sciences Research Ethics Review Committee (CREC) at the University of South Africa with CREC reference no: 2020-CHS-67128815. In addition, approval letters were received from Amhara and Oromia Regional Health Bureau Ethical Clearance Committees with reference number N/o/H/R/T/T/D/5/8 and BEFO/U/BTFH/H6/108, respectively. Written informed consent was obtained from respondents before data collection. The respondents were informed of their full right to decline participation in the study during the data collection process.
ResultsSocio-demographic characteristics
According to the calculated sample size, a total of 161 persons infected with leprosy were enrolled, and all respondents were literate in this study phase; the response rate was 100%. Of the total number of respondents, 102 (63.4%) were men. Forty-eight (29.8%) of the study respondents were between 30 and 39 years. The average mean age of the study respondents was 38.9 (standard deviation [s.d.] = ±15.2) years. The respondents’ age range was between 18 and 65 years, and the median age was 48 (29.8%) being between 30 and 39 years. One hundred fifty (90%) of the respondents were rural residents. Accordingly, 81 (50.3%) of the respondents were unemployed, 57 (35.4%) were retired and 23 (14.3%) were self-employed. Regarding education level and household income, 111 (68.9%) of the respondents had never attended education and 91 (56.5%) had a monthly household income of less than 500 Birrs (see Table 1).
Socio-demographic characteristics of persons infected with leprosy in leprosy high-burden districts of Amhara and Oromia regions (n = 161).
Variables
n
%
Age (years)
18–29
43
26.7
30–39
48
29.8
40–49
31
19.3
50–59
18
11.2
> 60
21
13.0
Gender
Male
102
63.4
Female
59
36.6
Place of residence
Urban
11
6.8
Rural
150
93.2
Employment status
Unemployed
81
50.3
Self-employed
23
14.3
Retired
57
35.4
Level of education
Never attended formal education
111
68.9
Primary school
36
22.4
Secondary school
11
6.8
Higher education
3
1.9
Household income in birr†
> 3500
8
5.0
3500–1500
11
6.8
1500–500
51
31.7
< 500
91
56.5
Note: Please see the full reference list of this article for details on the cited article: Marrye SS, Shakwane S. Access and utilisation of leprosy healthcare services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. S Afr J Infect Dis. 2024;39(1), a664. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.664.
, The food poverty line and poverty line (total poverty line) have been calculated to be 400 and 586 birrs per adult per month in Ethiopia.19
Knowledge of leprosy and its services
The knowledge of leprosy by persons infected with leprosy was classified as high if they were able to provide correct responses to at least three of four questions (≥ 75%) describing the nature of the disease (i.e. it is airborne; it affects skin, nerve and the inner side of the respiratory tract; it is curable and it causes disability if it has not been treated early). The number of respondents who showed a high level of knowledge was 38 (23.6%), while most respondents (123 [76.4%]) scored below 75% correct responses.
Of the persons infected with leprosy (n = 161) in the study, 100 (62.1%) had heard about leprosy before they were diagnosed with the disease themselves. Among the respondents who had heard about leprosy, 72 (44.7%) had accurately responded that leprosy could be transmitted through airborne means from infected patients. Moreover, 46 (28.6%) of the study respondents responded that leprosy is a curable disease, and 42 (26.1%) mentioned that leprosy causes disability if it is not treated early. However, 30 (18.6%) thought that leprosy can be inherited (see Table 2).
Knowledge of leprosy and access to care by the persons infected with leprosy in high-burden districts of Amhara and Oromia regions.
Variables
n
%
Knowledge of leprosy
Hereditary disease
30
18.6
Transmitted through airborne means
72
44.7
Affects skin, nerve and inner side of the respiratory tract
25
15.5
Curable disease
46
28.6
Causes disability if it has not been treated early
42
26.1
Symptoms of persons infected with leprosy
Pale patches on your skin
133
82.6
Lumpy or thickened skin
58
36.0
Pain or tingling in your arms 16
9.9
-
Loss of feeling on patches of skin or hands or feet
53
32.9
Muscle weakness in your hands feet, arms or legs
35
21.7
Muscle weakness around your eyes
21
13.0
Cuts, wounds or ulcers
25
15.5
Diagnosis by healthcare practitioners at first visit
Yes
35
21.7
No
126
78.3
Reasons not to visit healthcare practitioners
Fear of being identified
124
77.0
Unavailability of health care facilities
20
12.4
Quality of services provided
16
9.9
Influence of the traditional leader
30
18.6
Examination of leprosy of family members
Yes
49
30.4
No
112
69.6
Reasons family members were not examined
Lack of information about the diseases
92
57.2
Fear of stigma by the community
86
53.4
Health professionals do not instruct me
94
58.4
Referral to another health facility by the health care practitioner
Yes
64
39.8
No
97
60.2
Distance from the closest health care facility (km)
0–10
83
51.6
10–20
44
27.3
> 20
34
21.1
Waiting time for diagnosis of leprosy (weeks)
0–12
123
76.4
12–24
18
11.2
24–52
13
8.1
> 52
7
4.3
Note: Numbers may not add up to 100% as multiple responses are possible.
Factors affecting the knowledge of leprosy
A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors affecting the knowledge of persons infected with leprosy. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, variables such as age group of 50 to 59 years, urban residents and self-employed showed significant association with knowledge of leprosy (p < 0.05). Persons infected with leprosy within the age group of 50 to 59 years had less understanding of leprosy compared to the younger age groups (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] [95% CI] = 0.04 [0.003, 0.8]). However, persons infected with leprosy who reside in urban areas were more knowledgeable about leprosy than those who live in rural areas (AOR [95% CI] = 8.2 [1.6, 42.0]). Moreover, employed persons infected with leprosy were also more knowledgeable than unemployed persons (AOR [95% CI] = 21.3 [3.9, 117]) (see Table 3).
Factors affecting knowledge of leprosy among persons infected with leprosy in high-leprosy-burdened districts of Amhara and Oromia regions.
, p < 0.001 indicate strong significant association.
, The food poverty line and poverty line (total poverty line) have been calculated to be 400 and 586 birrs per adult per month in Ethiopia.19
Factors affecting the utilisation of leprosy diagnosis and treatment services
More than 126 (75%) persons infected with leprosy did not get a diagnosis and/or treatment services during the first visit to the health care facilities. Sixty-four (39.8%) persons infected with leprosy were referred to other health care facilities for further diagnosis and treatment services. At the same time, 83 (51.6%) persons infected with leprosy could access the health care facilities in the nearby area (0 km – 10 km). Furthermore, 123 (76.4%) persons had an average waiting time of up to 12 weeks during the first diagnosis of leprosy.
In multivariate logistic regression analysis, variables such as gender and waiting time to the first diagnosis of leprosy showed a significant association with health care facility use for leprosy diagnosis and treatment services. The male persons infected with leprosy were most likely to use health care facilities at the time of illness compared to female persons (AOR [95% CI] = 2.9 [1.2, 7.2]). However, the persons infected with leprosy who had a waiting time of 12–24 weeks from the start of illness were less likely to use the health care facility (AOR [95% CI] = 0.1 [0.03, 0.5]).
Additionally, in bivariate logistic regression analysis, variables such as being employed and availability within a 10 km radius of the health care facility showed significant association with health care facility use. For example, the persons infected with leprosy who are employed had a better chance of utilising health care facilities (COR [Crude odds ratio] [95% CI] = 4.7 [1.02, 21.5]) compared to those unemployed. Likewise, the persons infected with leprosy who live within a 10 km radius of the health care facility were more likely to utilise the leprosy diagnosis and treatment services (COR [95% CI] = 3.2 [1.3, 8.2]) (see Table 4).
Factors affecting the utilisation of leprosy diagnosis and treatment services among persons infected with leprosy in high-leprosy-burdened districts of Amhara and Oromia regions.
Variables
Health care facility use
COR
95% CI
AOR
95% CI
Yes
No
n
%
n
%
Age (years)
18–29
36
22.4
7
4.4
2.1
0.6, 7.2
-
-
30–39
40
24.8
8
5.0
2.0
0.6, 6.7
-
-
40–49
22
13.7
9
5.6
1.0
0.3, 3.3
-
-
50–59
13
8.1
5
3.1
1.0
0.3, 4.2
-
-
> 60
15
9.3
6
3.7
Reference
Reference
-
-
Gender
Male
87
54.0
15
9.3
2.9
1.4, 6.4**
2.9
1.2, 7.2*
Female
39
24.2
20
12.4
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Place of resident
Urban
10
6.2
1
0.6
2.9
0.4, 23.7
-
-
Rural
116
72.1
34
21.1
Reference
Reference
-
-
Employment status
Unemployed
56
34.8
25
15.5
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Self-employed
21
13.0
2
1.2
4.7
1.02, 21.50*
13.9
0.97, 200.00
Retired
49
30.4
8
5.0
2.7
1.13, 6.60*
2.4
0.8, 6.9
Level of education
Never studied
81
50.3
30
18.6
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Primary school
32
19.9
4
2.5
2.9
1.0, 9.2
1.1
0.31, 4.10
Secondary school
11
6.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
Higher education
2
1.2
1
0.6
0.7
0.1, 8.5
0.03
0.0006, 1.4800
Household income in birr†
< 500
67
41.6
24
14.9
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
1500–500
42
26.1
9
5.6
1.7
0.7, 3.9
0.9
0.3, 2.5
3500–1500
10
6.2
1
0.6
3.6
0.4, 29.5
2.9
0.1, 59.6
> 3500
7
4.4
1
0.6
2.5
0.3, 21.5
-
-
Distance from the nearby health care facility (km)
0–10
71
44.1
12
7.5
3.2
1.3, 8.2*
2.1
0.7, 6.6
10–20
33
20.5
11
6.8
1.6
0.6, 4.4
1.3
0.4, 4.2
> 20
22
13.7
12
7.5
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Waiting time to the first diagnosis of leprosy (weeks)
0–12
103
64.0
20
12.4
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
12–24
10
6.2
8
5.0
0.2
0.1, 0.7*
0.1
0.03, 0.50*
24–52
9
6.0
4
2.5
0.4
0.1, 1.6
0.6
0.1, 2.7
> 52
4
2.5
3
1.9
0.3
0.05, 1.20
0.1
0.01, 1.00
Note: Please see the full reference list of this article for details on the cited article: Marrye SS, Shakwane S. Access and utilisation of leprosy healthcare services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. S Afr J Infect Dis. 2024;39(1), a664. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.664.
, p < 0.001 indicate strong significant association.
, The food poverty line and poverty line (total poverty line) have been calculated to be 400 and 586 birrs per adult per month in Ethiopia.19
Factors affecting the utilisation of leprosy contact tracing services
One hundred twelve (70%) family members of persons infected with leprosy were not traced and examined for active signs of leprosy (see Table 2). Out of 38 (23.6%) (n = 161) persons infected with leprosy who had an active sign of leprosy, only 19 (50%) persons were offered leprosy contact tracing services for their family members.
In multivariable logistic regression model analysis, a variable such as the monthly household income of 1500–500 birr showed a significant association with tracing leprosy contacts among persons infected with leprosy (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the respondents whose household income was within the range of 1500–500 birr were more likely to have examined their family members for leprosy compared to those below income (AOR [95% CI] = 4.5 [1.6, 12.9]).
Moreover, in bivariate logistic regression analysis, variables such as being self-employed, having a secondary level of education and having a monthly household income of more than 1500 birr were significantly associated with receiving the service of leprosy contact tracing from health care practitioners (p < 0.05). The poverty line for Ethiopia is < 500 birr. Moreover, the persons infected with leprosy who are self-employed were more likely to have examined their family members at the health care facilities (COR [95% CI] = 2.7 [1.03, 7.2]).
Likewise, the persons infected with leprosy who have a secondary level of education had examined their family members for leprosy (COR [95% CI] = 29 [3.5, 242]) compared to those who had never attended education. The persons infected with leprosy whose household income was more than 1500 birr were more likely to have traced their family members for contact with leprosy by health care practitioners (see Table 5).
Factors affecting tracing of leprosy contacts among persons infected with leprosy in high-leprosy-burden districts of Amhara and Oromia regions.
Variables
Tracing of leprosy contacts
COR
95% CI
AOR
95% CI
Yes
No
n
%
n
%
Age (years)
18–29
11
6.8
32
20
Reference
Reference
-
-
30–39
17
10.6
31
19.3
1.6
0.6, 3.9
-
-
40–49
9
5.6
22
13.7
1.2
0.4, 3.3
-
-
50–59
7
4.4
11
6.8
1.9
0.6, 6.0
-
-
> 60
5
3.1
16
9.9
0.9
0.3, 3.1
-
-
Gender
Male
28
17.4
74
46.0
Reference
Reference
-
-
Female
21
13.0
38
23.6
1.5
0.7, 2.9
-
-
Place of resident
Urban
-
-
11
6.8
-
-
-
-
Rural
49
30.4
101
62.7
-
-
-
-
Employment status
Unemployed
33
20.5
48
29.8
Reference
Reference
-
-
Self-employed
15
9.3
8
5.0
2.7
1.03, 7.20**
0.55
0.12, 2.80
Retired
1
0.6
56
34.8
0.03
0.003, 0.200**
Reference
Reference
Level of education
Never studied
28
17.4
83
51.6
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
Primary school
10
6.2
26
16.2
1.1
0.5, 2.6
1.5
0.4, 5.4
Secondary school
10
6.2
1
0.6
29
3.5, 242.0*
-
-
Higher education
1
0.6
2
1.2
1.5
0.1, 17.0
-
-
Household income in birr†
< 500
18
11.2
73
45.3
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
1500–500
16
9.9
35
21.7
1.8
0.9, 4.1
4.5
1.6, 12.9*
3500–1500
9
5.6
2
1.2
18
3.6, 91*
-
-
> 3500
6
3.7
2
1.2
12
2.3, 65.0*
-
-
Distance from the nearby health care facility (km)
0–10
22
13.7
61
37.9
Reference
Reference
Reference
Reference
10–20
14
8.7
30
18.6
1.3
0.6, 2.8
0.6
0.2, 1.9
> 20
13
8.1
21
13
1.7
0.7, 4.0
1.0
0.3, 3.1
Waiting time to first diagnosis of leprosy (weeks)
0–12
37
23
86
53.4
Reference
Reference
-
-
12–24
7
4.4
11
6.8
1.5
0.5, 4.1
-
-
24–52
4
2.5
9
5.6
1.03
0.3, 3.6
-
-
> 52
1
0.6
6
3.7
0.4
0.1, 3.3
-
-
Note: Please see the full reference list of this article for details on the cited article: Marrye SS, Shakwane S. Access and utilisation of leprosy healthcare services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. S Afr J Infect Dis. 2024;39(1), a664. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.664.
, p < 0.001 indicate strong significant association.
, The food poverty line and poverty line (total poverty line) have been calculated to be 400 and 586 birrs per adult per month in Ethiopia.19
Discussion
This study aimed to identify factors affecting community access and utilisation of leprosy services in leprosy high-burden districts in Ethiopia. The findings suggest that overall knowledge about leprosy was low among persons infected with leprosy. Those infected with leprosy did not use the leprosy diagnosis and treatment services as expected.
This study showed that leprosy-infected individuals living in urban areas were more knowledgeable compared to those in rural areas (AOR [95% CI] = 8.2 [1.6, 42.0]). The study conducted in the eastern part of Ethiopia indicates that being an urban inhabitant was significantly associated with having a high level of knowledge of leprosy.20 Studies in India also revealed that most of the urban residents in the district of Tamil Nadu were knowledgeable about leprosy.21 Furthermore, infected communities need to be informed that leprosy can be treated and cured through the participation of patients, including their family members and affiliated associations such as persons infected with leprosy.3 Unfortunately, persons infected with leprosy from rural areas lacked the necessary knowledge about their disease, leading to poor treatment linkage.
The findings of this study also showed that male persons infected with leprosy were more likely to use health care facilities at the time of illness compared to female persons (AOR [95% CI] = 2.9 [1.2, 7.2]). These results are supported by the study that reflected contributing factors for the resurgence of leprosy in Timor.22 A study done in Brazil also revealed that most leprosy patients diagnosed at health care facilities were male persons.23 Results indicated that female persons infected with leprosy did not have a chance to access and use the leprosy services in the nearby health care facilities because of social stigma, low socio-economic conditions and other cultural issues such as gender inequalities.4
This study found that persons infected with leprosy who are employed had a better chance of utilising diagnostic and treatment services than unemployed people (COR [95% CI] = 4.7 [1.02, 21.5]). Higher income facilitates access to leprosy diagnosis and treatment and is associated with better leprosy treatment adherence and outcomes.24 Therefore, focusing on providing early detection and treatment services to lower-income groups and focusing on women as well could make a significant contribution to national leprosy control.25
The study revealed that persons infected with leprosy who have a secondary level of education were more likely to have their family members traced and examined for active signs of leprosy compared to those who had never attended education (COR [95% CI] = 29 [3.5, 242]). A study done in Benin on factors associated with leprosy screening activities indicated that a delay in screening family members of the first index is significantly associated with having education.26
This study also signifies that the persons infected with leprosy whose household had better income were more likely to have traced and screened their family members for active signs of leprosy (COR [95% CI] = 18 [3.6, 91]). There is a connection between the improved use of leprosy contact tracing services and a higher proportion of households with better socio-economic conditions.27 Therefore, the economic condition of the family has a great influence on the patient’s leprosy care-seeking behaviour, especially on diagnosis, treatment and contact tracing services.28 This means that families with a better household income can seek medical treatment at the onset of leprosy, improving health outcomes.
Overall, the study assessed and identified the gaps related to leprosy service use in high-burden districts. Socioe-conomic, geographical location and being women were identified as influencing factors in leprosy service utilisation in communities in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. Therefore, leprosy services should focus on rural areas, poor communities and women as persons from these groups lack knowledge about leprosy and are stigmatised because of their status in society. The results of this study strongly advocate the importance of designing and implementing new community-based interventions to strengthen leprosy control activities such as early case notification, treatment linkage and contact tracing, making leprosy health services inclusive and accessible to all persons infected with leprosy.
Limitations of the study
This phase of the study used a quantitative cross-sectional design, and the experiences of leprosy-infected individuals were not explored. Data were collected during political unrest in some parts of Ethiopia and COVID-19 pandemic restrictions limiting data collection locations and contact with leprosy-infected persons. Persons infected with leprosy are a vulnerable group as they are sometimes excluded from society and even families. Future studies should include illiterate people, children and women to eliminate stigma and leprosy-related disability.
Conclusion
This study showed that people infected with leprosy had little knowledge about leprosy and its treatment. Gender, household income, level of education and employment status were some of the factors that influenced access and utilisation of leprosy services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. Therefore, it is important to design and periodically develop campaigns to raise awareness activities considering those factors identified in the study to improve leprosy service utilisation and to improve awareness of the disease by staff of health care facilities.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the University of South Africa for the bursary for this research project. This article is partially based on the author’s thesis entitled ‘Community-based intervention for strengthening leprosy contact tracing, detection, and treatment linkage in Ethiopia’ towards the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Public Health, in the Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, South Africa, October 2024, with supervisor Prof Simangele Shakwane.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Authors’ contributions
S.S.M. and S.S. conceptualised and designed the study, prepared the draft of the article, reviewed the draft and approved the final version of the article.
Data availability
The data from this research are the property of the University of South Africa. All interested readers can request the data from the corresponding author, S.S.M., through the Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. This article does not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this study’s results, findings and content.
ReferencesAndrewK, KadalaM. Leprosy: A review of history, clinical presentation and treatments. Am J Infec Dis Micro Biol. 2020;8(3):88–94.FultonN, AndersonLF, WatsonM, AbubekerI. Leprosy in England and Wales 1953–2012: Surveillance and challenges in low incidence countries. BMJ. 2016;6(5):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010608SantosMB, SantosAD, BarretoAS, et al. Clinical and epidemiological indicators and spatial analysis of leprosy cases in patients under 15 years old in an endemic area of Northeast Brazil: An ecological and time series study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e023420. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023420PriceVG. Factors preventing early case detection for women affected by leprosy: A review of the literature. Glob Heal Act. 2017;10(1):63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1360550SubediM. Factors contributing to delay in diagnosis and start of treatment of leprosy: Analysis of help-seeking narratives from a community study in Dang District. Dhaul J Soci Antr. 2018;12:11–17. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v12i0.22175BetruKT, MakuaT. Challenges experienced and observed during the implementation of leprosy strategies in Sidama region, Southern Ethiopia: An inductive thematic analysis of qualitative study among health professionals who working with leprosy programs. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17(11):e0011794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011794JungHG, YangYK. Disease experiences of female patients with Hansen’s disease residing in settlement in Korea. Int J Equity Health. 2020;19(1):144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01264-7LiuYY, YuMW, NingY, WangH. A study on gender differences in newly detected leprosy cases in Sichuan, China, 2000–2015. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57(12):1492–1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.14148DharmawanY, FuadyA, KorfageIJ, RichardusJH. Delayed detection of leprosy cases: A systematic review of healthcare-related factors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(9):e0010756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010756TelesRMB, LuJ, Tió-ComaM, et al. Identification of a systemic interferon-γ inducible antimicrobial gene signature in leprosy patients undergoing reversal reaction. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(10):e0007764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007764LiyanageNR, ArnoldM, WijesingheS. Utilization of government healthcare services by adult leprosy patients in the Western Province, Sri Lanka. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(12):e0008973. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008973FekaduL, LambertSM, KebedeT, et al. Mapping leprosy in Ethiopia: Capture and analysis of district and health facility data to identify and map high leprosy burden districts in Ethiopia. Lep Rev. 2023;94(4):264–275. https://doi.org/10.47276/lr.94.4.264SoriEA. Review on the burden of leprosy in Ethiopia. J Trop Dis [serial online]. 2019 [cited 2021 Oct 20];7:297. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?btnG=Search%2BScholar&as_q=%22Review%2Bon%2Bthe%2Bburden%2Bof%2Bleprosy%2Bin%2BEthiopia%22&as_occt=any&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdtAAP=1&as_sdtp=1World Health Organization (WHO). Weekly epidemiological report [homepage on the Internet]. Volume 98, No. 37. Geneva, 2023 [cited 2024 Oct 11]; p. 409–430. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/372812/WER9837-eng-fre.pdf?sequence=1BreuerE, LeeL, De SilvaM, LundC. Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: A systematic review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0422-6RenK, Mc GuckinC. Using theory of change as both theory and method in educational research. Sage Research Methods Cases Part 1. London: SAGE Publications; 2022.CreswellJW, CreswellJD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. London: SAGE Publications Inc; 2018.PolitDF, BeckCT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017.DebebeS, ZekariasEH. Analysis of poverty, income inequality and their effects on food insecurity in southern Ethiopia. Agric Food Secur. 2020;9(1):16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-020-00269-3UrgesaK, BoboshaK, SeyoumB, et al. Knowledge of and attitude toward leprosy in a leprosy endemic district, Eastern Ethiopia: A community-based study. Risk Manag Health Policy. 2020;13:1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S254625GopalakrishnanS, GraceGA, SujithaP, Anantha EashwarVM. Knowledge, attitude, and health seeking behavior on leprosy among urban adults in Kancheepuram district of Tamil Nadu: A community-based cross-sectional study. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2021;10(5):1895–1903. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2086_20MartinsaN, GusmaobC, ViegascO, et al. Contributing factors to the resurgence of leprosy cases in Timor-Leste. Int J Sci Basic Appl Res. 2022;63(2):269–282.SerraMAAO, SantosCDS, Lima NetoPM, et al. Factors associated with multi bacillary leprosy in a priority region for disease control in North-eastern Brazil: A retrospective observational study. J Trop Med. 2019;2019:5738924. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5738924PescariniJM, WilliamsonE, NeryJS, et al. Effect of a conditional cash transfer program on leprosy treatment adherence and cure in patients from the nationwide 100 Million Brazilian Cohort: A quasi-experimental study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):618–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30624-3NeryJS, RamondA, PescariniJM, et al. Socioeconomic determinants of leprosy new case detection in the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort: A population-based linkage study. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7(9):e1226–e1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30260-8GnimavoRS, SopohGE, DjossouP, et al. Associated factors study into the belated screening for leprosy in Benin. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16(6):e0010533. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010533LeanoHAM, AraújoKMDFA, BuenoIC, NiitsumaENA, LanaFCF. Socioeconomic factors related to leprosy: An integrative literature review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(5):1405–1415. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0651TiwariA, SuryawanshiP, RaikwarA, ArifM, RichardusJH. Household expenditure on leprosy outpatient services in the Indian health system: A comparative study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(1):e0006181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006181
How to cite this article: Marrye SS, Shakwane S. Access and utilisation of leprosy healthcare services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. S Afr J Infect Dis. 2024;39(1), a664. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.664