Original Research
Knowledge and perceptions of South African blood donors towards biobanking and stool donation
Submitted: 23 March 2024 | Published: 31 October 2024
About the author(s)
Shantelle Claassen-Weitz, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South AfricaElloise Du Toit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe, Department of Statistics and Actuarial Sciences, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Brian Kullin, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Gregory Bellairs, Western Cape Blood Services, Cape Town, South Africa
Caroline Hilton, Western Cape Blood Services, Cape Town, South Africa
Anika Chicken, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Kirsten Welp, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Hannah Livingstone, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Adrian Brink, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; National Health Laboratory Service, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa; and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract
Background: The complexity of contexts and varied purposes for which biome donation are requested are unknown in South Africa.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to provide strategic data towards actualisation of whether a stool donor bank may be established as a collaborative between Western Cape Blood Services (WCBS) and the University of Cape Town (UCT).
Method: We designed a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey to determine willingness of WCBS blood donors to donate stool specimens for microbiome biobanking. The study was conducted between 01 June 2022 and 01 July 2022 at three WCBS donation centres in Cape Town, South Africa. Anonymous blood donors who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Anonymised demographic and interview data were analysed statistically.
Results: Analysis of responses from 209/231 blood donors demonstrated in a logistic regression model that compensation (p < 0.001) and ‘societal benefit outweighs inconvenience’ beliefs (p = 7.751e-05) were covariates significantly associated with willingness to donate stool. Age was borderline significant at a 5% level (p = 0.0556). Most willing stool donors indicated that donating stool samples would not affect blood donations (140/157, 90%). Factors decreasing willingness to donate were stool collection being unpleasant or embarrassing.
Conclusion: The survey provides strategic data for the establishment of a stool bank and provided an understanding of the underlying determinants regarding becoming potential donors.
Contribution: This is the first report on the perspectives of potential participants in donating samples towards a stool microbiome biobank in South Africa, a necessity for faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goal
Metrics
Total abstract views: 380Total article views: 339